Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Painting with Words


As I pondered about Stein’s repetitious and circular writing style that paints pictures instead of telling stories, I thought of another member of the Modernist movement, William Carlos Williams, and his poem “The Dance”:

In Brueghel's great picture, The Kermess,
the dancers go round, they go round and
around, the squeal and the blare and the
tweedle of bagpipes, a bugle and fiddles
tipping their bellies (round as the thick-
sided glasses whose wash they impound)
their hips and their bellies off balance
to turn them. Kicking and rolling
about the Fair Grounds, swinging their butts, those
shanks must be sound to bear up under such
rollicking measures, prance as they dance
in Brueghel's great picture, The Kermess.

In this poem, Williams attempts to depict the painting the Kermess and capture the movement and excitement of its dancing scene. He uses rhyming words, especially ones that rhyme with “round,” in order to create the sense of repetitive movement from dancing. Furthermore, the poem begins and ends with the identical words: “In Brueghel’s great picture, The Kermess.” Not only are the dancers in the poem going “round and around” in endless circles, but the poem is a circle in itself in which the reader makes a “round” by the end of the poem and ends up exactly where he or she had started. In his effort to depict the painting, Williams attempts to infuse animation into something dead, noise into something silent, and motion into something unmoving. However, while one may go “round and around” in trying to describe a painting, ultimately, words cannot infuse it with the life that is present in its visual form, and the reader can only truly grasp its title and and name of painter.

While Williams tries to depict with words something that is understood through the senses, Stein does not try to accurately match her words to reality. For instance, in Tender Buttons, she does not even try to describe the objects that she lists as entry titles. Instead, she transcends the goal of realistic depiction. Instead of viewing language as a barrier to communication, like Williams, she views it as an endless door to opportunities. She does not try to limit herself to the meanings of language assigned by her social context; instead, she uses language freely, not trying to imitate something sensual by using words. Therefore, on the one hand, her words in each entry seem less connected to the object that she associates them with. On the other hand, they are much closer to the object because they are Stein’s subjective way of communicating about it. Just like Williams, she also uses repetition and rhyme--but not necessarily because they correspond with the object that she is writing about. She is the artist who is creating her own dancing scene based on her own imagination, instead of trying to imitate one from another painting like Williams. It is possible to say that Williams in this poem is trying to do realist painting, while Stein is involved in something more abstract.

Here is the image that Williams attempts to describe:



10 comments:

  1. I really liked your comparison to William Carlos Williams and your explanation of the similarities and differences between him and Stein.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Emily, I really enjoyed your comparison.

    At first, however, I had trouble with your statement "in Tender Buttons, she does not even try to describe the objects that she lists as entry titles." This bothered me because I believe Stein very much is trying to describe those objects, otherwise why would she put them there as titles. I just think she is describing it in a way of her own and how she perceives them, making it all the more difficult for us to understand.

    However, you cleared it up for me when you explained that while her words may seem less connected to the object, they are actually "much closer to the objet because they are Stein's subjective way of communicating about it."

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's so interesting to see two people essentially doing the same thing yet achieving such different results and reactions. Your comparison is a great way to show that Stein wasn't looking to describe, as Williams does but " her subjective way of communicating about it"

    ReplyDelete
  4. Cool reference to Williams. In your blog, you write that through the imagery of "going round", Williams expresses an inability of semantic art to capture the life of a visual form. I find this difficult. Such a claim implies that William's poem is simply attempting to mimic Bruegel's painting, and that it does not stand as a separate art form on its own. In fact, in his "Pictures of Brueghel", a compilation of Williams' poems on Bruegel's art, he does not include any images. This indicates that he sees his poetry as worthy art forms separate from the paintings. Instead of arguing that the cyclic imagery in the poem evokes the limitations of language, I think Williams is trying to comment on the relationship between language and image. Language functions in chronological progressions, but Williams wants to cross-bread this form with the visual, which has no sense of time. Images can be viewed in an instant. Achieving unity in a text, then, can only be accomplished once the text is completed. A reader has to constantly go back to the text in order to see its unity. Unity for an image, however, is viewed instantaneously. By forcing his readers to constantly return to the poem through cyclic language, he tries to establish a sense of unity to the text. He wants readers to approach a text in the way they view a painting, that is, by recognizing unity.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I would agree with this, but doesn't Stein's writing also evoke Cubist paintings, too, in the way that she takes words depicting the true state of reality and "mashes" them up into a form that represents how she views it? I found this very similar to the way Picasso created his Cubist style.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sarit's comment below begins to get at something important, I believe:

    "She is the artist who is creating her own dancing scene based on her own imagination, instead of trying to imitate one from another painting like Williams."

    Although Williams also sometimes experimented with making the medium (language) the message, so to speak (see for example "The Rose is Obsolete"), his mode in the poem Sarit cites is certainly more transparently descriptive than Stein's in Tender Buttons. Williams' writing spans from the wildly experimental to the more conventionally descriptive and lyrical. Stein's writing is more consistently committed to one project. Where Williams, at least here, describes a dance with his words, Stein's words are themselves the dance. They may dance to the rhythms of their associative "subjects," but they don't dance ABOUT their subjects, as with our friend the good Doctor.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I changed the link text to the actual picture for you. Sarit, if you would like to learn how to use the blogger tools better, I would be happy to make an appointment to teach you how at some point.

    Good post, by the way--insightful and on task.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sarit, I loved this post! I think it really drives home the point of what Stein was attempting to do with her words. I think a difference between Stein and Williams is that Williams tries to describe the painting in words, he tries to describe for his reader the image of the art, what the painting looks like whereas Stein tries to give her reader the feeling of the art, what the feelings she feels feels like. Williams' poetry does try to provide a sensory feeling but it's mostly visual. Stein's is an emotional response.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Very cool comparison, Sarit. I agree with your statement that Stein is not describing objects. Rather, she is discussing the feel or experience of objects. As Professor Miller said, Stein's words are the dance.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I enjoyed reading your analysis of William's poem and Stein as a whole. Mostly, I agreed with your statement about Stein's language being free and not bound by traditional societal views. However, I disagree with your comment about Stein's lack of sensual feeling. I believe Stein did want the reader to have a sensual experience. I view this as the explanation for her abundant use of alliteration.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.